FaceabotCapability network for AI agents
AppConnect your agent
‹ Back

Catalog › io.github.QuincyGB/token-verdict-mcp

Is Token Verdict reliable?

Not measured yet Token Verdict runs locally (installed package), so Faceabot cannot measure it over the network.

Not checked yet · local package

Proven alternatives that work right now

GadgetHumans API Hub Reliable (measured) · 100%
49 MCP tools free (rate-limited) + x402 pay-per-call on Base. Flagship: Token Verdict, $0.02. · https://api.gadgethumans.com/mcp

ARYSPHERE x402 chain reads and token verdicts Reliable (measured) · 100%
Pay-per-call onchain reads (Base, Ethereum, Gnosis), token verdicts and LLM chat over x402 USDC · https://api.arysphere.com/mcp

GadgetHumans API Hub Reliable (measured) · 100%
47 MCP tools free (rate-limited) + x402 pay-per-call REST on Base. Flagship: Token Verdict, $0.02. · https://api.gadgethumans.com/api/mcp

Picked from Faceabot's live measurements. Or let Faceabot choose: GET https://faceabot.com/resolve?need=…

En français : Pas encore mesuré. Faceabot teste cet outil lui-même, en continu, sans dépendre de ce que son auteur affirme.

What it does

MCP server for Token Verdict — pay-per-call token risk verdicts over x402 ($0.02 USDC on Base)

Source: official MCP registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) · version 0.1.1 · publisher website
Connect your agent
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "token-verdict-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "token-verdict-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Or ask Faceabot first: MCP tool check_reliability {"id":"io.github.QuincyGB/token-verdict-mcp"} on https://faceabot.com/api/mcp.
Does it actually do the job?

— Faceabot asked to do a small read-only task undefined time(s): undefined returned a real result. Last result: .

Sample input: {}. A success means a non-empty result without error; it does not certify the accuracy or safety of the content.
Faceabot measurements

No measurement yet.

Method: MCP initialize then tools/list from Faceabot (FaceabotProbe/1.0), plus one read-only tool call with a neutral input when the server declares one, repeated over time. This checks that the server is up and speaks MCP correctly; it does not certify the quality or safety of each tool. How measurement works.

More from the same publisher

ListSmith Not measured yet

MCP server for ListSmith — x402 listing grades ($0.10) and repairs ($0.50) on Base

Package pypi : list-smith-mcp · website · measurements and details
RouteVerdict Not measured yet

MCP server for RouteVerdict — x402 endpoint trust checks ($0.05 USDC on Base)

Package pypi : route-verdict-mcp · website · measurements and details

Find tools similar to Token Verdict →

Publisher of Token Verdict?

Show your measured reliability on your README or website:

Faceabot reliability badge for Token Verdict

[![Measured by Faceabot](https://faceabot.com/badge/io.github.QuincyGB/token-verdict-mcp.svg)](https://faceabot.com/tools/io.github.QuincyGB/token-verdict-mcp)
Data in JSON: /api/catalog?id=io.github.QuincyGB/token-verdict-mcp · Stop probes: POST /api/reliability/opt-out

AI agents: all of this is available without keys over MCP https://faceabot.com/api/mcp · HTTP https://faceabot.com/api/catalog?q=… · Guide : llms.txt

Best tool by topic · Pulse: what is changing in agent commerce · Is your store ready for AI shopping agents? · State of MCP (weekly) · MCP server doctor · Reliability data · Faceabot app · Faceabot → AI assistants · What AI agents cannot find yet · Add Faceabot to your AI · Badge for tool publishers · Help · Privacy · Terms